微软ERP系统(Microsoft Dynamics)的未来,溶合或共存 ?

摘要:
微软ERP系统有四种产品:GP、AX、NAV和SL。其中GP和SL来自微软收购的美国本土产品,NAV和AX来自丹麦软件公司收购的产品。本文来自http://www.albaspectrum.com,标题为:Microsoft Dynamics:GP、AX、NAV、SL、CRM–合并共存?ByAndrew Karasev的结论如下:“我们相信,未来的Microsoft Dynamics将是多个应用程序系统的组合:Microsoft Dynamics AX和小企业会计系统将是其旗舰产品,Microsoft Dynamics GP和NAVandSL将保持现有模式,以服务现有客户并向传统产品领域销售。Microsoft Dynamics AX将进一步开发和扩展其功能离子,深入ERP领域,并获得不断增长的销售额。”
    
      微软ERP系统(Microsoft Dynamics)有四个产品:GP, AX, NAV, SL。其中GP(原名 Great Plains)、SL (原名 Solomon)来源微软并购的USA本地产品,NAV(Navision)和AX(Axapta)来源于收购的丹麦一家软件公司的产品。其中AX 正由 中国长沙的创智软件集团MBS事业部(微软战略合作伙伴)http://www.powerise.com.cn/mbs/ 进行本地化,AX 4.0简体中文版计划2006年底完成。英文版 AX4.0 已发布,EMule 电骡软件可以DOWNLOAD。

    
   这四个产品中,未来发展的重点是产品AX,它将集成其它产品的功能,这样有利于推广、本地化等工作,下面的文章对其未来的发展方向进行了预测,供参考。


           本文来源于 http://www.albaspectrum.com,标题为:

           Microsoft Dynamics: GP, AX, NAV, SL, CRM – merge or coexistence?

 By Andrew Karasev

  他的结论如下:

     “我们相信未来的Microsoft Dynamics 将是几个应用系统的结合:Microsoft Dynamics AX 和小型商务财会系统将是其旗舰产品(对应大、中、小型商务),Microsoft Dynamics GP, NAV and SL 将维持目前的模式,以服务现存的客户且向产品的传统领域出售。Microsoft Dynamics AX 将会进一步开发和扩展功能,向ERP领域的纵深发展,并获得不断增长的销售。”

 

      Conclusion :We believe that future Microsoft Dynamics will be combination of several applications: Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Small Business Accounting will be the flagships (form large/midsize and small businesses respectively).  Microsoft Dynamics GP, NAV and SL will be in maintenance mode to serve existing clients and sell to their traditional niches.  Microsoft Dynamics AX will be in development and expansion mode – to get into ERP horizontals and verticals and new sales will be increasing for Microsoft Dynamics AX


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

原文如下:

      Obviously it is non-official opinion and we are just trying to guess on the future direction of Microsoft Dynamics or former Microsoft Project Green.  These lines are written in June of 2006, based on the analysis of Microsoft Business Solutions policy and real actions in the USA, Europe, Latin America and Brazil.  Let’s begin.

      Software Initial Development vs. Purchasing and Branding.  To create ERP application from scratch is probably too risky business and it requires venture capital intervention to make new-born MRP a success.  Most Microsoft Dynamics ERP products were purchased, not developed from scratch (exception is Microsoft Dynamics CRM).  Microsoft is good in finding a right moment to come to the market, when it is not yet mature, but it is clear that it is from now on real, not risky

      Project Green Initiative.  At least this was how we understood it back in earlier XXI century.  It was like this – ERP application modules should be kind of standardized: Financials, HR, Distributions, Manufacturing, Logistics, etc.  The integration between so-called Microsoft Suites is just a matter of technical solution development.  As MS now owns several applications: Great Plains (Financials,. Distributions, HR), Axapta (Supply Chain and large corporate businesses), Solomon (Project Accounting), Navision (Manufacturing) – MS can get the best part of each application, encapsulate it into respective modules/suites and integrate into Project Green (on .Net platform, using C# or VB.Net).  However, look at the first bullet – this approach to Project Green requires revolutionary rewriting and modules redesign (in the meaning of making them cross-compatible)

       MS Outlook Interface.  Obviously majority of office workers are familiar with MS Outlook, MS Word, Excel, or MS Office.  And the idea to capitalize on this fact is very attractive.  If you look at Microsoft Dynamics GP – it is evolutioning to get kind of the same interface as MS Outlook (the same should be told about Microsoft Small Business Accounting)

      What is the Plan?  Maybe it is a way more simple than it was initially planned?  Let’s for the moment assume this – why should we merge products?  We can make them interact with MS Office, MS Sharepoint, MS CRM, Exchange, etc.  We can expose business logic for light development on .Net level – eConnect approach (leaving initial proprietary technologies: Great Plains Dexterity, Axapta MorphX/X++, Navision C/Side)

      International Approach.  Microsoft Axapta is good to be launched on emerging markets and we see strong MS efforts to launch Axapta (the newest in MS Dynamics ERP product line) in Brazil, LATAM, Russia – to name a few.  Navision – well – this one has a lot of clients in Europe, plus MS BS probed Navision in East Europe and LATAM – for these existing clients MS will probably keep maintaining Microsoft Dynamics NAV line in maintenance.  MS Great Plains – has strong presence in US/Canada – in order to keep these clients Microsoft Dynamics GP should be probably in maintenance and at the same time when company grows over its limits – conversion utility should help to migrate to Axapta/Microsoft Dynamics AX

       ERP Maturity/Life Cycle.  There is another theory – ERP has life cycle and it is too risky to purchase newcomer, it is good to purchase market winner and it is not good to purchase ERP in its phasing out mode.  However MS might be breaking this traditional approach by integrating ERP into its MS Office stack of products

       Multinational Corporation.  Large company has to offset multiple risks, related to ERP market, MRP selection and implementation.  It is good idea to have small budget to understand which international ERP brand (or combination of brands) is good for your international operations: Microsoft Dynamics, SAP mySAP or SAP Business One, Oracle E-Business Suite, etc.  Good example – Brazilian operations of US company (Great Plains in Chicago headquarters) deployed SAP Business One in Brazil to comply to Brazilian regulation – one of the main reasons for this turn was GP is not localized and supported in Brazil

      Conclusion.  We believe that future Microsoft Dynamics will be combination of several applications: Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Small Business Accounting will be the flagships (form large/midsize and small businesses respectively).  Microsoft Dynamics GP, NAV and SL will be in maintenance mode to serve existing clients and sell to their traditional niches.  Microsoft Dynamics AX will be in development and expansion mode – to get into ERP horizontals and verticals and new sales will be increasing for Microsoft Dynamics AX

     Please do not hesitate to call or email us: USA/Canada: 1-866-528-0577, 1-630-961-5918, Europe: +44 20 8123 2580, +45 36 96 55 20, Mexico: 52-55-535-04027 help@albaspectrum.com

       Andrew Karasev is Chief Technology Officer at Alba Spectrum Technologies ( http://www.albaspectrum.com http://www.ronix-systems.de http://www.enterlogix.com.br ) - Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains, Navision, Axapta, MS CRM, Oracle Financials, SAP Business One and IBM Lotus Domino Partner, serving corporate customers in the following industries: Aerospace & Defense, Medical & Healthcare, Distribution & Logistics, Hospitality, Banking & Finance, Wholesale & Retail, Chemicals, Oil & Gas, Placement & Recruiting, Advertising & Publishing, Textile, Pharmaceutical, Non-Profit, Beverages, Conglomerates, Apparels, Durables, Manufacturing and having locations in multiple states and internationally.

       We are serving USA Nationwide: CA, IL, NY, FL, AZ, CO, TX, WI, WA, MI, MA, MO, LA, NM, MN, Europe: Germany, France, Belgium, Poland, Russia, Middle East (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, OAE, Bahrain), Asia: China, Australia, New Zealand, Oceania, South & Central America: Mexico, Peru, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico

免责声明:文章转载自《微软ERP系统(Microsoft Dynamics)的未来,溶合或共存 ?》仅用于学习参考。如对内容有疑问,请及时联系本站处理。

上篇IE兼容rgba()透明度(转载)Linux定时任务cron配置下篇

宿迁高防,2C2G15M,22元/月;香港BGP,2C5G5M,25元/月 雨云优惠码:MjYwNzM=

相关文章

CRM与ERP整合的六个切入点

一边是干劲十足的信息化建设,一面是彼此相互隔绝的信息系统,各种软件系统在努力帮助企业提升的同时,却又“老死不相往来”。如何互通有无,相互打通?成为企业在“后信息化时代”所需要攻克的主要难关。笔者在此总结CRM与ERP整合的六个切入点。  如今日益深入的信息化进程,让客户关系管理系统(CRM)与企业资源计划系统(ERP)走入越来越多的企业,一些老的问题随着信...

ERP和SAP的区别

1、定义不同 ERP即(Enterprise Resource Planning)企业资源计划,由美国Gartner Group 公司于1990年提出。 ERP叫企业资源计划,既是一种管理思想,也是一种企业应用软件,只作为管理思想,ERP体现“集成管理、共享数据、最优化资源利用”等的思想;作为软件,它实际上就是一种管理信息系统,但是这种管理信息系统是基于统...

开源CRM和ERP撑起后台系统能走多远

任何一家公司的后台系统需要许多不同层软件。像电子邮件和基本网站这些必要的部分是运行起来相对简单的。最困难的任务就是提供下列这种软件:充当公司业务 的核心、处理所有大大小小的最基本的细节;以及让客户支付发票金额、确保银行账户里面有足够现金来付工资。 这些系统就包括客户关系管理(CRM)和企业资源规划(ERP)等应用系统,但它们其实只是一组精心创建的数据库表,...

EWM与ERP交互程序

System Message Sender Recipient Communication Type Monitoring Transaction /SPE/GOODSMVT_CREATE EWM ERP qRFC SMQ1 (EWM) / SMQ2 (ERP) /SPE/INB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC EWM ER...

微软ERP Dynamics AX 20年简史

     既然对微软的ERP有兴趣,就必须了解其历史,把握其未来的发展方向。     下列Dynamics AX的介绍,对关注微软ERP的人可能有用。      在 秋毫ERP咨询  http://www.qiuhao.com/  ,你能下载到 英文 AX 4.0 的最新版,同时能与其它关注 微软ERP的人们进行讨论。      http://www.qi...

吉特仓储管理系统-ERP或WMS系统中常见术语

  MPS---主生产计划(Master Production schedules)   MTO---订货生产(Make-to-Order)   BOM---物料清单或产品结构表(Bill of material) BPR---企业业务流程重组(Business process Reengineering) DRP---(Distribution Reso...